Archive for the ‘Political’ Category

Perreira’s Opinion Shared By Many

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

By: Trustee Rowena Akana

Source: Lettter to the Editor, Honolulu Advertiser, April 22, 2010

The editorial opinion shared by Randy Perreira in your paper speaks for the many thousands of people who share the same sentiments (“DHS proposal will increase social calamity,”April 14).

What on earth can the Lingle administration be thinking?

It is so unfortunate that when government mis-spends our tax dollars, it is always the school children and the less fortunate who suffer.

Perhaps it is time for our local people to start our own “Tea Party Group” and tackle real-life issues instead of political philosophies.

Gaming tax law is hypocritical

Saturday, August 8th, 2009

By: Trustee Rowena Akana

Source: Letter to the Editor, Honolulu Star Bulletin, August 8, 2009

Thanks to the new law shepherded by state Rep. Pono Chong, Hawaii residents going to Las Vegas will owe taxes on all of their winnings which cannot be offset by any of their losing hands.

The law makes the state Legislature look hypo-critical. For as long as I can remember, all efforts to pass legalized gambling in Hawaii have failed.

The state Legislature has stuck to the position that gambling is not a panacea to solve our budget shortfalls or worth risking the 5 per-cent of our residents who become hopelessly addicted. Legislators have also said that gambling sends the wrong message to our keiki and that we should be teaching them to build a good life through education and hard work instead of encouraging them to just “roll the dice” with their future.

Chong has sold the soul of the Legislature for a measly $300,000 a year of potential tax revenue. The Legislature should move to repeal the new law. It appears two-faced not to allow gambling in Hawaii and still say it is OK to tax winnings that Hawaii residents receive in another state. They can’t have it both ways.

Who does Winona Rubin work for?

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

By: Trustee Rowena Akana

Source: Letter sent to The Garden Island Editor, October 15, 2008

I feel it is important for all of The Garden Island readers to know that Winona Rubin, who sent a negative letter against me on Saturday (“Sad state of affairs,” Letters, Oct. 11), currently works for Office of Hawaiian Affiars Chairperson Haunani Apoliona.

I am appalled that someone would hypocritically complain about “distortions” and “misinformation” and yet fail to disclose who she really works for and what the true motivations for her letter were – Job Security.

Rubin’s behavior is consistent with what she has done in the past.  For example, she has written negative letters against me and signed her sister’s name to them.  It is these kinds of actions that make me question the credibility and honesty of this person.

Rubin’s letter, therefore, needs to be taken with a grain of salt.

Stender is a liar

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

By: Trustee Rowena Akana

Source: The Garden Island, October 15, 2008

Office of Hawaiian Affairs Trustee Oswald Stender’s Saturday (“Election-year smears,” Letters, Oct. 11) letter against me just shows that he is living in complete denial about his friends Haunani Apoliona and Colette Machado and is terrified that when they lose this election, he will have to give up his Finance Committee where all of the excess spending has come from and will have to submit to a forensic audit. 

For the record:

• I have never used OHA money to take any personal trips and have never solicited invitations to take trips anywhere.

• All of my travel has been approved by the OHA administrator.

• I am the chair of the Native Hawaiian Health Task Force, which has never been dissolved by the board.

• It was Stender and Trustee Boyd Mossman who asked me to speak with the local representative of the Jack Abramoff firm. On a trip to Washington, D.C., trustees Machado, Apoliona, Dante Carpenter, John Waihee IV, myself and the administrator all interviewed three lobbyist firms. I never, at any time, insisted that OHA hire the Abramoff firm.

• Apoliona has, by far, outspent all current and past trustees with her travel expenses. On one trip to D.C. in 2007 alone, she spent nearly $9,000. She spent $56,000 from 2005-2006.

•  People who remember when Stender was with the Bishop Estate know that he created so much trouble from the inside of that institution that it finally collapsed and now the Princess’ will has been broken forever.

• As a Bishop Estate trustee, Stender formed a consortium with private investors to outbid his own board to buy a section of land from Maui Land & Pine. He even used a study done by Bishop Estate for his private use with his consortium. For this action, he should have been removed as a trustee for a breach of trust.

It is really sad to see someone so afraid of losing his power on the OHA board that he will do anything — even lie and twist the truth — to discredit his fellow trustee to maintain the status quo.

This is exactly why there needs to be changes on the OHA board. It’s time, folks, it’s time.

My Hope for Change

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

By: TRUSTEE ROWENA AKANA

Source: October 2008 Ka Wai Ola o OHA Column

My Hope for CHANGE and what voters should know about OHA Trustees running for re-election 

I can tell you all about the millions and millions of dollars being spent at OHA with no accountability.

I can tell you that since Apoliona has been OHA Chairperson, all of the programs that existed when she took the chairmanship are now gone. 

I can tell you that since she became the Chair, our annual budget went from $24 million to $52 million. This year, OHA’s budget is $36,664,847. Add to that the $11,358,014 being encumbered and $4,792,605 left over from last year’s budget making our current budget swell to a tidy sum of $52,815,466. Where is all that money going? Only six budget meetings were held this year, out of the 13 scheduled. Because of cancellations, and there was never any agenda that allowed Trustees to question budget spending.

I can tell you too that Apoliona continues to renew contract after contract for the same lobbyist in Washington, D.C., and other consultants, to the tune of $2.75 million, even though we have not achieved the outcome we sought.

EXTENSIVE TRAVEL

I can tell you that for at least four years, Apoliona has traveled all over the continental U.S. with her sister, OHA’s Administrator and other staff members.  Apoliona has spent millions buying dinners, hosting parties, sponsoring events all across America and Washington, D.C., flying on unrestricted airline tickets and first-class, and spent almost $8,000 on one trip alone with still nothing to show for it. Grants have been given out to many organizations and individuals on the mainland that are not 501(c)3 to sign up Native Hawaiians for Kau Inoa. After awhile, you feel as though you are back in the time of the Wild West, where there were no laws and no one to hold you accountable for your actions.

NEPOTISM

I can tell you that nepotism lives here at OHA. With Apoliona’s sister flying first-class all over the U.S. and spending trust dollars like it was her own, and maxing out an OHA credit card at $10,000. Apoliona’s sister then used her own credit card to charge expenses and then sought reimbursements of up to almost $50,000.

MORALE

I can tell you that the morale at OHA has never been lower. Eight employees this year alone either were fired or quit because of the oppressive “Big Brother” culture that has spread like a cancer within the OHA offices. Employees are fingerprinted for I.D. cards so they can be tracked as they access their offices, security cameras watch their every move, and they are constantly reminded that they are “at-will” employees and can be fired at anytime. They are also told that they do not work for the Trustees and must answer only to the Administrator.

HARRASSMENT

I can tell you that harassment and smear campaigns against any Trustee or employee that criticizes the goings-on here is not beneath Apoliona. If you are a staffer, you are simply fired. If you are a Trustee, Apoliona threatens you with censorship and plants things in newspapers to discredit you and to draw attention away from HER. For instance, a recent article written by a Star-Bulletin reporter, who is a friend of our Public Information Officer, wrote about my travel expenses but didn’t print anything about Apoliona’s $8,000 trip to D.C.  Trustees’ articles are also read by the Administrator before being printed in the Ka Wai Ola and if there is criticism of the office, the administration will have their own article in the same paper to negate your article.

I can tell you that, two years ago, Colette Machado, who is running for re-election from Molokai-Lanai, misled the Board by asking us to approve a resolution supporting Molokai Ranch’s efforts to give the community thousands of acres of land in exchange for a development of high-end homes to be built on the ranch. Machado told us that the community supported this effort and we believed her and approved the resolution. One year later, we found out that this was not the case at all. Machado also failed to tell us at the time that she was involved with the land trust that was to control the donated lands and that she later became the chair of the land trust. Last year, a nonprofit group representing this land trust came to OHA for a grant and received $100,000 for operating costs.

While this kind of behavior may seem incredible of people who were elected to protect your trust assets, it pales in comparison to the behavior they display to beneficiaries when they come before us to testify at the Board table. For example, during a hearing held at the state Capitol when I was working on a Kupuna health initiative, many Kupuna came from all of the islands to testify before the Board in support of a proposed OHA supplemental drug plan. The Kupuna explained to the Trustees about how important this plan was to them, sharing stories about how they had to split their medication in half to stretch it because they couldn’t afford the medication. Both Machado and Apoliona voted against the plan. Not only did they vote against it, they were rude to the Kupuna who came to testify and even made some of them cry. 

Machado said to one Kupuna who had flown in from Hilo and was in a wheelchair, “Do you think that I am going to vote for this just because you came here in a wheelchair and your oxygen machine?”

In another incident, when Apoliona and Machado were elected in 1996, Apoliona immediately wanted to become Chair of the Board after just being elected. In an interview with me she asked, “Who would you support for the chairmanship?” I replied: “Moses Keale. He is the most senior Trustee, he has the most experience, he is fair, he is the longest-serving member, and he started most of the programs that we are continuing here. Not only that, this is his last term.” Apoliona’s response was a cold, “Moses is sick and he’s going to die.” I replied, “Everyone is going to die, only God knows when that will be.” At the time, Moses was on a dialysis machine twice a week. Needless to say, neither Apoliona nor Moses became the Chair that year. However, it didn’t stop her from telling him that he should retire and get off the Board. These comments were made to a man who had given 12 years of his life to OHA, without any compensation. I have served on the Board for 18 years and have met wonderful Trustees along the way, but I have never met two more “mean-spirited” people than Machado and Apoliona, who continue to display bad behavior that is unconscionable.

Our people deserve better. They deserve leaders who can lead by example and leaders who are able to work with everyone. Leaders who can inspire and bring hope to our younger generation of Hawaiians who will come after us. Leaders who can agree to disagree with those who do not share our views but who can respect them for their differences. We cannot treat people who do not agree with us as enemies, we will never be able to build a nation that way.

In this election year, voters can make the necessary changes and elect people who will be accountable and listen to other perspectives and views and most of all listen to our beneficiaries. This is my hope for CHANGE.  Mahalo Ke Akua.

Why Two OHA Trustees Should Not Return to OHA

Friday, September 26th, 2008

By: Trustee Rowena Akana
Friday, September 26, 2008

Source: Letter sent to various newspaper editors

OHA has had no fiscal accountability under Haunani Apoliona’s chairmanship. Programs have been eliminated or outsourced while our annual budget has doubled from $24 million to $52 million. The contracts of underperforming vendors have been unlawfully extended multiple times.

Apoliona has spent millions flying first-class and hosting lavish parties on the mainland. Her sister also works for OHA and recently had nearly $50,000 on her personal charge card reimbursed by OHA.

Morale at OHA has never been lower. Ten employees were fired or quit this year. Employees are fingerprinted for I.D. cards, tracked by security cameras, and constantly reminded that they can be fired at anytime.

Apoliona’s friend, Trustee Colette Machado, misled the Board into approving a resolution supporting Molokai Ranch’s plan to donate thousands of acres of land to the community in exchange for a development of high-end homes on the ranch. Machado said the community supported this effort, which turned out to be false. Machado was also involved with the group that was to control the donated lands and she is now its chairperson. Machado’s group recently received a $100,000 OHA grant for “operating costs.”

In this election year, voters must make the necessary changes and elect people who will be accountable.

Blaming others…

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

By: TRUSTEE ROWENA AKANA

Source: June 2008 Ka Wai Ola o OHA Column

`Ano`ai kakou…  I wasn’t surprised when I opened the May issue of the Ka Wai Ola to see that fellow trustee Haunani Apoliona listed me first among those that she felt killed her negotiated settlement bill (HB266 HD2).  I guess I could see it as a compliment that she thinks I have such powerful influence, but once again, Apoliona misses the point.  The truth is, if Apoliona wants to look for someone to blame for the fiasco during this past legislative session, she needs to remember the phrase “the buck stops here,” or at least that is what good leaders presume.

It is obvious to me what killed OHA’s ceded land settlement legislation with the governor on the past due ceded land revenues that are owed to OHA.  It was Haunani Apoliona’s sheer arrogance.  Apoliona believed that she could just ram her legislation down everyone’s throat, including the legislature. 

She also completely misses the obvious fact that we needed to get the legislature’s approval for the settlement.  No one likes surprises, least of all politicians.  Apoliona also criticizes the five Senators who killed the bill, but what do you expect them to do when nearly a hundred OHA beneficiaries show up and testify against the bill for almost five hours?  Her “my way or the highway” attitude doomed the bill from the very beginning.

 For The Record

I opposed HB266 HD2 because the bill, if passed into law, would have bound our beneficiaries to a settlement agreement that was signed between OHA and the State on January 17, 2008.  The agreement contained language that would forever extinguish all rights afforded to Native Hawaiians under section 4 and 6 of Article XII of the State Constitution.  When I questioned OHA’s leadership about this language, they basically told me to not worry about it.  Then, after the fact, Senate President Colleen Hanabusa revealed in the May 6, 2008 Honolulu Advertiser that, “OHA leaders told her and other senators that the idea of eliminating future claims in exchange for $15.1 million annually in the future was (attorney general) Bennett’s idea and that they reluctantly agreed.  They had to agree to go along with it or the AG would no longer negotiate.”  OHA’s negotiating team deceived beneficiaries, the legislature, and fellow trustees by saying the agreement was mutual and that the amended language meant nothing.

Ka Wai Ola Now a Mouthpiece for OHA Leadership

I am truly disappointed with the direction that our Ka Wai Ola newspaper has taken ever since we lost 75% of our newspaper staff last year.  There is no longer any sense of fairness or balance in what is being reported to our beneficiaries and, in my opinion, it is now nothing more than a propaganda rag.  Nothing critical of OHA’s leadership is ever printed.  I have also received complaints from beneficiaries that their letters-to-the-editor are not being printed.  This is the first time in the many years I’ve been at OHA that the Ka Wai Ola has been reduced to a publication that, to some extent, is being censored.  For example, when an issue is deemed too controversial, somehow, thousands of copies of the newspaper seem to get lost and are not delivered to beneficiaries.  Also, as retribution for my past criticisms, you can now find my articles in the back of the paper.

Employee Exodus Continues in April

Three employees left OHA in April.  Two were accountants and one of them wrote a letter to trustees saying she felt she was unfairly terminated.  The other accountant resigned.  I have asked the Administration to discuss these departures at the next Board meeting.  The third employee that left was the high-profile manager of Hi’ipaka LLC.

Final Thoughts

The fact that there was no settlement between OHA and the State is very unfortunate.  Especially since Ms. Apoliona has claimed that she and the Governor’s office have been negotiating for three years.  This statement, on its face, appears less than truthful when you factor in the fact that the state offered up a couple of pieces of land and wrote language in the settlement document that HAD TO BE ACCEPTED BY OHA or there would be no deal.  These actions make it clear that THERE WAS NO NEGOTIATIONS going on at all!  There were only “take it or leave it” offers by the state which OHA’s negotiating team finally agreed to.

What is crystal clear now is that the state had every intention to keep all of the best ceded lands and had decided to appeal our Hawaii State Supreme Court decision not to allow the state to sell ceded lands until Hawaiian land claims could be settled.  The appeal by the State to the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse that decision makes the state’s efforts to settle with OHA and the Hawaiian people disingenuous.  To add insult to injury, the state has hired the former U.S. Solicitor General under President Clinton (who represented the state and OHA in the Rice v. Cayetano case) to represent the State of Hawaii in their appeal against OHA in the U.S. Supreme Court.

It is time for all Hawaiians to rally together for justice and to replace leaders who do NOT represent their interests in the November 4, 2008 General Election.  For more information on how to register to vote or to be a candidate in the OHA election, please call the Office of Elections at 453-8683 (Oahu) or toll free at 1-800-422-8683 for the neighbor islands.  Imua e Hawaii nei…

Response to supporters of Clarence Ching

Wednesday, November 15th, 2006

By: Trustee Rowena Akana
November 2006

Source: Letter to the Editor, Ka Wai Ola o OHA

My letter is addressed to Gwen Burrows and Vaasiliifiti Tauo Taumasaosili who wrote letters to the Ka Wai Ola complaining about the content of my August 2006 trustees’ column. Both writers were specifically critical of my comments referencing Clarence Ching, a former OHA trustee who went to Washington D.C. to lobby against the Akaka Bill along with William Burgess, who has consistently filed law suits against OHA and the Department of Hawaiian Homelands to remove any Hawaiian-only preferences to any and all benefits set aside by law for the Hawaiian people.

Let me say that I certainly do not view myself or other trustees as “whores” who are “in bed with the enemy,” whomever that may be (as Ms. Burrows suggests). I am sorry that they took a personal offence to my comments regarding Mr. Ching’s seating arrangement.

I believe that both of them missed my point entirely. People like Burgess have successfully used Hawaiians against other Hawaiians in the past. Burgess is obviously not in agreement with Mr. Ching’s views about Hawaiian Sovereignty. Burgess wants the Akaka Bill to fail so that entitlements for Native Hawaiians can be eliminated. Clarence, on the other hand, probably just doesn’t believe the Akaka Bill is the way to achieve Hawaiian Self-Determination. In any case, it is my view that Hawaiians should not allow Non-Hawaiians to manipulate or use them against other Hawaiians. That was my point.

It is absolutely appropriate for Hawaiians to disagree among themselves about what kind of self-determination we should eventually have. It is not appropriate for us to let Non-Hawaiians lead our way down a path we have not chosen for ourselves.

Nowhere in my article do I suggest that Hawaiians must follow OHA’s path. It is, and always will be, the right of every Hawaiian to seek independence or any other form of government that they choose.

Candidate Statements for the Ka Wai Ola o OHA

Sunday, October 15th, 2006

For OHA Trustee Rowena Akana

October 2006

1.  WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE A TRUSTEE?

Few people understand the complex responsibilities of an OHA trustee.  Not only do they serve as elected officials, but more importantly, you must also manage all of the assets, both monetary and tangible, in the Native Hawaiian Trust Fund.  Further, OHA trustees must follow the Trust Laws of Hawaii and may be held personally accountable under state law for any misguided decision that they make.  Being a steward of this Trust demands that you understand all that the law requires of you under Hawaii Revised Statues 554-A.

2.  WHAT EXPERIENCE OR PERSONAL QUALITIES WOULD YOU BRING TO THE POSITION?

Elected to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in 1990, I am the most senior member of the Board of Trustees.  In 1990, OHA’s trust assets were $11 million.  In 1993, the board negotiated a settlement worth about $129 million with the State for the past due revenues owed to OHA from 1980.  By 1996, through prudent investing, OHA’s net worth had grown to almost $400 million.  This was done by carefully selecting Money Managers who understood our mission and diligently monitoring their performance in the stock market.  At present, I am the only remaining OHA Trustee who was part of the team that originally built the OHA portfolio.  OHA would not be able to provide all of its current services without sufficient funds.

3.  WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER TO BE THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES CONFRONTING OHA OR THE HAWAIIAN PEOPLE? 

Hawaiians face a combination of issues that we must address simultaneously.  For example:

1. How to strategically plan to deal with impending lawsuits against our Trust;

2. Developing a 10-year plan that will include a timetable to achieve the goals set forth in the plan.  The plan can be visited again in five years for updates and amending or deleting sections that we find unnecessary.  The plan should include the development of an economic base to sustain OHA and prepare for a transition to Nationhood.  We must develop an economic base through strategies such as partnering with developers, banks, and other private companies to increase our revenue streams and to provide services to our people i.e., land & housing, healthcare, schools and other needs;

3. Looking at the resources that surround us and finding ways to tap into them;

4. Carefully looking at an inclusive plan to bring all Hawaiians together to discuss our future and to develop ways for us to work together on the things that we can all agree to;

Clearly, for me, we have two pressing issues.  First is the passage a formal document from Congress that assures Hawaiians of self-determination and the right to negotiate for reparations.  Second, determining the process to be used to define and identify Hawaiians who will be eligible to participate in the self-governance process.  I believe that a comprehensive education campaign on this process is crucial.  Unless Hawaiians can clearly understand what is being done on their behalf they will not support it.  BRINGING HAWAIIANS TOGETHER TO DISCUSS ISSUES THAT ARE CLOSE TO THEIR HEART IS A START IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION…

4.  AS AN OHA TRUSTEE, HOW WOULD YOU ADDRESS THOSE ISSUES?

To address these issues, we need to start at the beginning and with Trust.  Listen to the different ideas of our beneficiaries and then ask them to listen to ours.  Find some common ground.  Work towards finding ideas that we can all accept.  If the differences end up being too great and we are not going anywhere in the process, we could suggest a multi-party system.  The Queen had two independent parties.  IT IS NOT INCONCEIVABLE FOR OUR SELF-DETERMINATION DOCUMENT TO HAVE MORE THAN ONE PARTY IN IT.

5.  IF YOU COULD ONLY ACCOMPLISH ONE GOAL AS TRUSTEE, WHAT WOULD THAT BE?

If I could only accomplish one goal at OHA, it would be to see a Hawaiian government once again flying its Hawaiian Flag.

Let Down by Legislative Leaders

Wednesday, September 15th, 2004

By: OHA TRUSTEE ROWENA AKANA

Source: September 2004 Ka Wai Ola o OHA Column

`Ano`ai kakou…  Before you head to the ballot box in the coming elections, I’d like to share with you two experiences I had in the past legislative session.

State Senate: 

One of the bills that I really pushed hard for at the legislature this past session was Senate Bill 2759, relating to Kuleana Lands.  Many Hawaiian families who have been caring for their Kuleana Lands for generations face the loss of their legacy as well as the potential for homelessness because mainland and foreign entities are building luxury homes and shopping malls on the adjacent property.  This causes their property value and taxes to skyrocket.  Things are getting so bad that a family has asked OHA to take custody of their Kuleana Lands until they were able to save up enough money to pay off their back taxes.

SB 2759 passed all of its Senate committees and looked set to crossover to the House when it was abruptly “recommitted” or sent back to its original Senate committee.  In all my years of lobbying the legislature, I have never heard of a bill being killed in this fashion.  I later learned that an attorney for the County of Hawaii called the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and got the bill killed.  In the mean time, Hawaiian families on Kuleana Lands continue to suffer.

State House:

On April 1, 2004, Board of Trustees voted unanimously to support Governor Linda Lingle’s proposals to reform the public education system in Hawaii.  The Board took this position because of OHA’s constitutional mandate to work for the betterment of the conditions for Native Hawaiians and the findings in Kamehameha School’s PASE (Policy Analysis and System Evaluation) Report.

The PASE Report found that rather than helping underprivileged students, the current system has compounded social and economic disadvantages through its unequal distribution of educational and teaching resources.  A large number of underprivileged children are not getting the help they need.  As a result, Hawaiian children are too often deprived of opportunities for intellectual engagement, social growth, and other aspects of a quality education that provide the keys to lifetime opportunities and fulfillment.

With local school boards, the Hawaiian community will have a more direct say in how educational opportunities are provided to Hawaiian students.  We could also develop culturally appropriate learning models that will allow Hawaiian students to achieve greater success.

Most people know that OHA is a non-partisan entity.  The Trustees would never support the Governor’s proposal based on politics.  Unfortunately, the Democrats in the state legislature didn’t see it this way.

In an April 2, 2004 Advertiser article, Sen. Norman Sakamoto, D-15th (Waimalu, Airport, Salt Lake), questioned whether OHA Trustees even understood the Governor’s proposal and joked about creating more than one Office of Hawaiian Affairs.

Our Board Chairman sent a letter to the editor (Advertiser, April 16, 2004) clearly explaining that OHA took its position for the educational welfare of Hawaiian children and not for political reasons.  But that explanation wasn’t good enough for the House Democrats.  They wanted payback.

OHA introduced Senate Bill 1155 to help Trustees receive proper service credit for retirement purposes.  The bill seemed all set to pass out of the House Finance committee.  Then, shortly after OHA took its position supporting the Governor’s plan for educational reform, the bill suddenly died.  Coincidence?  Not a chance.  The Committee chose to punish the Trustees for supporting the Governor’s position on local school boards.

I encourage everyone to carefully consider the candidates’ stand on issues important to the Hawaiian community.  It’s time to help our friends and “crush” our enemies, regardless of their political affiliation.  We must collectively show all elected officials that Hawaiian votes count by making our voices heard!  Imua e Hawai’i nei…